From: | Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl> |
Subject: | Re: logical replication apply to run with sync commit off by default |
Date: | 2017-03-20 23:56:40 |
Message-ID: | a4bad561-b537-b5e7-8734-da145a50e754@2ndquadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 18/03/17 13:31, Petr Jelinek wrote:
> On 07/03/17 06:23, Petr Jelinek wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> there has been discussion at the logical replication initial copy thread
>> [1] about making apply work with sync commit off by default for
>> performance reasons and adding option to change that per subscription.
>>
>> Here I propose patch to implement this - it adds boolean column
>> subssynccommit to pg_subscription catalog which decides if
>> synchronous_commit should be off or local for apply. And it adds
>> SYNCHRONOUS_COMMIT = boolean to the list of WITH options for CREATE and
>> ALTER SUBSCRIPTION. When nothing is specified it will set it to false.
>>
>> The patch is built on top of copy patch currently as there are conflicts
>> between the two and this helps a bit with testing of copy patch.
>>
>> [1]
>> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA+TgmoY7Lk2YKArcp4O=Qu=xOoR8j71MAd1OTEojAWmujE3k0w@mail.gmail.com
>>
>
> I rebased this patch against recent changes and the latest version of
> copy patch.
>
And another rebase after pg_dump tests commit.
--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
0001-Add-option-to-modify-sync-commit-per-subscription.patch | text/x-patch | 21.3 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Craig Ringer | 2017-03-21 00:33:32 | Re: Inadequate traces in TAP tests |
Previous Message | Petr Jelinek | 2017-03-20 23:54:20 | Re: Logical replication existing data copy |