Re: btree_gist into core?

From: Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: btree_gist into core?
Date: 2022-01-24 23:10:30
Message-ID: a4a4c618-37a1-f004-6916-e70b788499c9@proxel.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 1/19/22 09:30, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> So, first of all, would people agree with this course of action?
>
> I don't have a lot of experience with this module, so I don't know if
> there are any lingering concerns about whether it is mature enough as a
> built-in feature.

While it I like the idea on a conceptual level I worry about the code
quality of the module. I know that the btree/cidr code is pretty broken.
But I am not sure if there are any issues with other data types.

See
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/7891efc1-8378-2cf2-617b-4143848ec895%40proxel.se

Andreas

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2022-01-24 23:15:40 Re: Replace uses of deprecated Python module distutils.sysconfig
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2022-01-24 22:57:18 Re: XTS cipher mode for cluster file encryption