Re: [HACKERS] Cached plans and statement generalization

From: Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Cached plans and statement generalization
Date: 2017-12-04 15:46:07
Message-ID: a47db8e0-16c0-32ef-60b1-6ee3ebac5f3e@postgrespro.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 30.11.2017 04:59, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 2:11 AM, Konstantin Knizhnik
> <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
>> One more patch passing all regression tests with autoprepare_threshold=1.
>> I still do not think that it should be switch on by default...
> This patch does not apply, and did not get any reviews. So I am moving
> it to next CF with waiting on author as status. Please provide a
> rebased version. Tsunakawa-san, you are listed as a reviewer of this
> patch. If you are not planning to look at it anymore, you may want to
> remove your name from the related CF entry
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/16/1150/.

Updated version of the patch is attached.

--
Konstantin Knizhnik
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company

Attachment Content-Type Size
autoprepare-5.patch text/x-patch 71.8 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fabien COELHO 2017-12-04 15:47:34 Re: [HACKERS] pow support for pgbench
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-12-04 15:44:14 Error handling (or lack of it) in RemovePgTempFilesInDir