Re: [HACKERS] Cached plans and statement generalization

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Cached plans and statement generalization
Date: 2018-01-06 22:51:18
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers


* Konstantin Knizhnik (k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru) wrote:
> On 30.11.2017 04:59, Michael Paquier wrote:
> >On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 2:11 AM, Konstantin Knizhnik
> ><k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
> >>One more patch passing all regression tests with autoprepare_threshold=1.
> >>I still do not think that it should be switch on by default...
> >This patch does not apply, and did not get any reviews. So I am moving
> >it to next CF with waiting on author as status. Please provide a
> >rebased version. Tsunakawa-san, you are listed as a reviewer of this
> >patch. If you are not planning to look at it anymore, you may want to
> >remove your name from the related CF entry
> >
> Updated version of the patch is attached.

This patch appears to apply with just a bit of fuzz and make check
passes, so I'm not sure why this is currently marked as 'Waiting for

I've updated it to be 'Needs review'. If that's incorrect, feel free to
change it back with an explanation.



In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2018-01-06 22:59:42 Re: [HACKERS] Surjective functional indexes
Previous Message Nikita Glukhov 2018-01-06 22:50:59 Re: [HACKERS] SQL/JSON in PostgreSQL