Re: [PATCH] Improve amcheck to also check UNIQUE constraint in btree index.

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: Pavel Borisov <pashkin(dot)elfe(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Improve amcheck to also check UNIQUE constraint in btree index.
Date: 2021-04-08 14:36:36
Message-ID: a3e98907-dbca-f6ab-c985-427dee72721f@pgmasters.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 3/15/21 11:11 AM, Mark Dilger wrote:
>
>> On Mar 2, 2021, at 6:08 AM, Pavel Borisov <pashkin(dot)elfe(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> I completely agree that checking uniqueness requires looking at the heap, but I don't agree that every caller of bt_index_check on an index wants that particular check to be performed. There are multiple ways in which an index might be corrupt, and Peter wrote the code to only check some of them by default, with options to expand the checks to other things. This is why heapallindexed is optional. If you don't want to pay the price of checking all entries in the heap against the btree, you don't have to.
>>
>> I've got the idea and revised the patch accordingly. Thanks!
>> Pfa v4 of a patch. I've added an optional argument to allow uniqueness checks for the unique indexes.
>> Also, I added a test variant to make them work on 32-bit systems. Unfortunately, converting the regression test to TAP would be a pain for me. Hope it can be used now as a 2-variant regression test for 32 and 64 bit systems.
>>
>> Thank you for your consideration!
>>
>> --
>> Best regards,
>> Pavel Borisov
>>
>> Postgres Professional: http://postgrespro.com
>> <v4-0001-Make-amcheck-checking-UNIQUE-constraint-for-btree.patch>
>
> Looking over v4, here are my review comments...

This patch appears to need some work and has not been updated in several
weeks, so marking Returned with Feedback.

Please submit to the next CF when you have a new patch.

Regards,
--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Steele 2021-04-08 14:45:58 Re: allow partial union-all and improve parallel subquery costing
Previous Message David Steele 2021-04-08 14:23:10 Re: 2019-03 CF now in progress