separate serial_schedule useful?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: separate serial_schedule useful?
Date: 2017-10-06 19:37:09
Message-ID: a37e9c57-22d4-1b82-1270-4501cd2e984e@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I noticed that the test "hash_func" was listed in parallel_schedule but
not in serial_schedule. I have seen that a few times recently where a
patch proposes to add a new test file but forgets to add it to the
serial_schedule.

I wonder whether it's still useful to keep two separate test lists. I
think we could just replace make installcheck with what make
installcheck-parallel MAX_CONNECTIONS=1 does. Thoughts?

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2017-10-06 20:16:06 Re: separate serial_schedule useful?
Previous Message Nico Williams 2017-10-06 19:36:54 Re: [PATCH] A hook for session start