Re: speeding up planning with partitions

From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Imai, Yoshikazu" <imai(dot)yoshikazu(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: speeding up planning with partitions
Date: 2019-01-11 01:18:31
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2019/01/11 2:56, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2019-Jan-10, Amit Langote wrote:
>> Here's v12, which is more or less same as v11 but with the order of
>> patches switched so that the code movement patch is first. Note that the
>> attached v12-0001 contains no functional changes (but there's tiny note in
>> the commit message mentioning the addition of a tiny function which is
>> just old code).
> Pushed 0001 with some minor tweaks, thanks.

Thank you for the tweaks and committing.


In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2019-01-11 01:50:32 Re: [Sender Address Forgery]Re: error message when subscription target is a partitioned table
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2019-01-11 01:14:13 Re: Making WAL receiver startup rely on GUC context for primary_conninfo and primary_slot_name