Re: small improvement of the elapsed time for truncating heap in vacuum

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
To: Kasahara Tatsuhito <kasahara(dot)tatsuhito(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: small improvement of the elapsed time for truncating heap in vacuum
Date: 2020-02-19 11:50:48
Message-ID: a34df67e-dbef-1818-34ea-44622d0a56b5@oss.nttdata.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2020/02/17 17:52, Fujii Masao wrote:
>
>
> On 2020/02/17 14:28, Kasahara Tatsuhito wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 1:07 PM Masahiko Sawada
>> <masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>>> For the patch, we can put also the declaration of ru0 into the loop.
>> Thanks for your reply.
>> Hmm, certainly that it may be better.
>>
>> Fix the v2 patch and attached.
>
> Thanks for updating the patch!
> Barring any objection, I will commit this.
>
> As far as I check the back branches, ISTM that
> this patch needs to be back-patch to v9.5.

Pushed. Thanks!

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
NTT DATA CORPORATION
Advanced Platform Technology Group
Research and Development Headquarters

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2020-02-19 12:45:36 Re: RecoveryWalAll and RecoveryWalStream wait events
Previous Message John Naylor 2020-02-19 11:31:20 Re: Portal->commandTag as an enum