| From: | walther(at)technowledgy(dot)de |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Christophe Pettus <xof(at)thebuild(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: Regression tests fail with musl libc because libpq.so can't be loaded |
| Date: | 2024-03-22 08:33:38 |
| Message-ID: | a2463df1-be45-4a76-b90f-7676d778e7b1@technowledgy.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian:
> I suggest we use the #ifdef test to continue our existing behavior for
> the libraries we know about, like glibc, and use the LD_* process title
> truncation hack for libc's we don't recognize.
>
> Attached is a prototype patch which implements this based on previous
> patches.
The condition to check for linux/glibc in your patch is slightly off:
#if ! defined(__linux__) || (! defined(__GLIBC__) &&
defined(__UCLIBC__ ))
should be
#if defined(__linux__) && ! (defined(__GLIBC__) || defined(__UCLIBC__ ))
With the latter, it passes tests with musl.
Best,
Wolfgang
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Richard Guo | 2024-03-22 08:55:47 | Re: BUG #18305: Unexpected error: "WindowFunc not found in subplan target lists" triggered by subqueries |
| Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2024-03-22 08:28:29 | Re: Index plan returns different results to sequential scan |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jelte Fennema-Nio | 2024-03-22 08:54:29 | Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Add non-blocking version of PQcancel |
| Previous Message | jian he | 2024-03-22 08:28:39 | Re: Catalog domain not-null constraints |