| From: | Manfred Koizar <mkoi-pg(at)aon(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: New horology failure |
| Date: | 2004-05-24 16:02:44 |
| Message-ID: | a174b01d22nhjb04qi22mth8cep834k6na@email.aon.at |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
[resending...]
On Sun, 23 May 2004 11:38:51 +0800, Christopher Kings-Lynne
<chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> wrote:
>I get this since Tom's commit.
>--- ./results/horology.out Sun May 23 11:39:49 2004
>***************
>*** 1787,1796 ****
>! | Sat Sep 22 18:19:20 2001 PDT | @ 34 years | Fri Sep 22 18:19:20 1967 PDT
>[...]
>--- 1787,1796 ----
>! | Sat Sep 22 18:19:20 2001 PDT | @ 34 years | Fri Sep 22 18:19:20 1967 PST
>[...]
I got the same with snapshot-20040521 yesterday [i.e. 2004-05-22]
afternoon when I ran make check. But only once. make installcheck
passed all tests, and the failure didn't reappear when I tried make
check again.
I just got the failure again with make check after having configured
with a new install directory. My guess is that horology needs some
datafile from the install location.
Servus
Manfred
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ismail Kizir | 2004-05-24 16:38:58 | Optimizer bug?? |
| Previous Message | Manfred Koizar | 2004-05-24 16:00:36 | Re: zero-column table behavior |