From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Dynamic result sets from procedures |
Date: | 2017-11-03 17:55:03 |
Message-ID: | a0b4f579-4a08-6984-012c-484b13084370@2ndquadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 11/2/17 16:40, Daniel Verite wrote:
> But instead of having procedures not return anything,
> couldn't they return whatever resultset(s) they want to
> ("no resultset" being just a particular case of "anything"),
> so that we could leave out cursors and simply write:
We could in general design this any way we want. I'm just going by
what's in the SQL standard and in existing implementations.
> CREATE PROCEDURE test()
> LANGUAGE plpgsql
> AS $$
> RETURN QUERY EXECUTE 'SELECT 1 AS col1, 2 AS col2';
> END;
> $$;
>
> Or is that not possible or not desirable?
RETURN means the execution ends there, so how would you return multiple
result sets?
> Similarly, for the SQL language, I wonder if the above example
> could be simplified to:
>
> CREATE PROCEDURE pdrstest1()
> LANGUAGE SQL
> AS $$
> SELECT * FROM cp_test2;
> SELECT * FROM cp_test3;
> $$;
> by which the two result sets would go back to the client again
> without declaring explicit cursors.
> Currently, it does not error out and no result set is sent.
But maybe you don't want to return all those results, so you'd need a
way to designate which ones, e.g.,
AS $$
SELECT set_config('something', 'value');
SELECT * FROM interesting_table; -- return only this one
SELECT set_config('something', 'oldvalue');
$$;
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Nico Williams | 2017-11-03 17:56:28 | Re: [PATCH] Add ALWAYS DEFERRED option for constraints |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2017-11-03 17:54:30 | Re: Add some const decorations to prototypes |