| From: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Beena Emerson <memissemerson(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [Sender Address Forgery]Re: [Sender Address Forgery]Re: [Sender Address Forgery]Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning |
| Date: | 2018-01-12 04:12:21 |
| Message-ID: | a0890481-4ceb-a6bb-7180-9f156176c2d0@lab.ntt.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
David,
On 2018/01/12 12:30, David Rowley wrote:
> Can you also perform a self-review of the patch? Some of the things
> I'm picking up are leftovers from a previous version of the patch. We
> might never get through this review if you keep leaving those around!
Sorry, I will look more closely before posting the next version. I guess
I may have rushed a bit too much when posting the v18/v19 patches, partly
because it's been 3 weeks since v17 and I felt I needed to catch up
quickly given the activity on the run-time pruning thread which depends on
the patches here.
Thanks,
Amit
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2018-01-12 04:26:00 | Re: Enhance pg_stat_wal_receiver view to display connected host |
| Previous Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2018-01-12 04:05:22 | Re: [HACKERS] GUC for cleanup indexes threshold. |