Re: old product version number

From: Joel Stevenson <atani(at)redfish(dot)net>
To: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: "Thomas O'Dowd" <tom(at)nooper(dot)com>
Subject: Re: old product version number
Date: 2001-06-29 16:39:48
Message-ID: a05001913b7625f9bcf67@[192.168.0.70]
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

Looks like that change from 1.9 to 1.10 would do it! Thanks.

At 1:31 AM +0900 6/30/01, Thomas O'Dowd wrote:
>Hmmm, it is likely that you are using an old driver... See the
>diffs at...
>
>http://www.ca.postgresql.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/interfaces/jdbc/org/postgresql/jdbc2/DatabaseMetaData.java.diff?r1=1.9&r2=1.10
>
>Looks like it used to return the version number of the driver... The current
>cvs driver works quite well and I imagine has fixed a number of problems
>since then.
>
>Tom.
>
>On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 08:54:35AM -0700, Joel Stevenson wrote:
>>
>> >On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 11:29:15AM -0700, Joel Stevenson wrote:
>> >> I'm new to the list, so hello everybody.
>> >>
>> >> Can anybody tell me why the DatabaseMetaData
>> >> getDatabaseProductVersion () method is returning 6.5.2 when I'm
>> >> running version 7.1? The getDriverVersion correctly returns 7.0.
>> >> Can't find anything in the docs or archives.
>> >
>> >the source for that function executes the code "select version()".
>> >What do you get when you psql into you database and execute this?
>>
>> from psql:
>> testdb=> select version();
>> version
>> -----------------------------------------------------------
>> PostgreSQL 7.1 on i586-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by GCC 2.96
>> (1 row)
>>
>>
>> >Tom.
>> >--
>> >Thomas O'Dowd. - Nooping - http://nooper.com
>> >tom(at)nooper(dot)com - Testing - http://nooper.co.jp/labs
>>
>
>--
>Thomas O'Dowd. - Nooping - http://nooper.com
>tom(at)nooper(dot)com - Testing - http://nooper.co.jp/labs

In response to

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-06-29 17:21:58 Re: [PATCHES] Re: High Memory Usage Patch -- Disregard my last message
Previous Message Thomas O'Dowd 2001-06-29 16:31:43 Re: old product version number