On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 02:53:50PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> And here is what I had in mind, checking the error code on top of the
> output. The output is really optional, but that maps with 0 with the
> offset applied, so I've just kept it.
I had some time this morning, so I have looked at it again, kept the
patch as-is, and backpatched all the way down (with proper authorship
of course).
--
Michael