From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Fujii(dot)Yuki(at)df(dot)MitsubishiElectric(dot)co(dot)jp" <Fujii(dot)Yuki(at)df(dot)mitsubishielectric(dot)co(dot)jp> |
Cc: | Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alexander Pyhalov <a(dot)pyhalov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
Subject: | Re: Partial aggregates pushdown |
Date: | 2024-08-15 18:48:42 |
Message-ID: | Zr5Nikqw_a8JvFq7@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Jul 7, 2024 at 09:52:27PM +0000, Fujii(dot)Yuki(at)df(dot)MitsubishiElectric(dot)co(dot)jp wrote:
> Hi Bruce.
>
> > From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
> > Is there a reason the documentation is no longer a part of this patch?
> > Can I help you keep it current?
>
> Here are the reasons:
> Reason1. The approach differs significantly from the previous patch that included documentation, the below.
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/attachment/152086/0001-Partial-aggregates-push-down-v34.patch
> Reason2. I have two options for transmitting the state value and I'm evaluating which one is optimal.
> One is what I presented you in PGConf.dev2024. The other is Jelte's one.
> He listened to my talk at the conference and gave me some useful comments on hackers. I'm very grateful that.
> Reason3. The implementation and test have been not finished yet.
> Regarding Reason 2, I provided my conclusion in the previous message.
>
> My plan for advancing the patch involves the following steps:
> Step1. Decide the approach on transmitting state value.
> Step2. Implement code (including comments) and tests to support a subset of aggregate functions.
> Specifically, I plan to support avg, sum, and other aggregate functions like min and max which don't need export/import functions.
> Step3. Add documentations.
>
> To clarify my approach, should I proceed with Step 3 before Step2?
> I would appreciate your feedback on this.
Thanks, I now understand why the docs were remove, and I agree. I will
post about the options now in a new email.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
Only you can decide what is important to you.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alena Rybakina | 2024-08-15 19:13:32 | Re: POC, WIP: OR-clause support for indexes |
Previous Message | Nathan Bossart | 2024-08-15 18:45:48 | Re: Remove dependence on integer wrapping |