Re: pg_sequence_last_value() for unlogged sequences on standbys

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_sequence_last_value() for unlogged sequences on standbys
Date: 2024-05-08 02:01:01
Message-ID: Zjrc3e-3eg4i6WQV@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, May 07, 2024 at 02:39:42PM -0500, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> Okay, phew. We can still do something like v3-0002 for v18. I'll give
> Michael a chance to comment on 0001 before committing/back-patching that
> one.

What you are doing in 0001, and 0002 for v18 sounds fine to me.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Masahiko Sawada 2024-05-08 02:53:34 Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2024-05-08 01:21:56 Re: Use pgstat_kind_infos to read fixed shared stats structs