Re: Support a wildcard in backtrace_functions

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Jelte Fennema-Nio <me(at)jeltef(dot)nl>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Support a wildcard in backtrace_functions
Date: 2024-04-29 22:54:20
Message-ID: ZjAlHJCf17gDbKbC@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 08:08:19AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 5:12 AM Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> wrote:
>> Ok, it's reverted.

Thanks for taking care of it.

> Thanks, and sorry. :-(

Sorry for the outcome..
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2024-04-29 23:14:37 Re: Support tid range scan in parallel?
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2024-04-29 22:42:52 Re: A failure in prepared_xacts test