| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Jelte Fennema-Nio <me(at)jeltef(dot)nl>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Support a wildcard in backtrace_functions |
| Date: | 2024-04-29 12:08:19 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZ032j_dRYvsmxvG=faxtFsGC7-gaptrj_28YaQMa_TiA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 5:12 AM Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> wrote:
> On 27.04.24 00:16, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 02:39:16PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Well, in that case we have to have some kind of control GUC, and
> >> I think the consensus is that the one we have now is under-designed.
> >> So I also vote for a full revert and try again in v18.
> >
> > Okay, fine by me to move on with a revert.
>
> Ok, it's reverted.
Thanks, and sorry. :-(
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2024-04-29 12:36:29 | Re: Tarball builds in the new world order |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2024-04-29 12:07:58 | Re: Direct SSL connection with ALPN and HBA rules |