Re: Partitioned tables and [un]loggedness

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Partitioned tables and [un]loggedness
Date: 2024-04-24 23:44:41
Message-ID: ZimZaRDnT65EuA5F@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 08:35:32AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> That's why the current restrictions are in place: you should
> be able to mix them.

Correction due to a ENOCOFFEE: you should *not* be able to mix them.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2024-04-24 23:50:22 Re: Remove unnecessary code rom be_lo_put()
Previous Message David G. Johnston 2024-04-24 23:43:58 Re: Partitioned tables and [un]loggedness