Re: GUC-ify walsender MAX_SEND_SIZE constant

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Majid Garoosi <amoomajid99(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: GUC-ify walsender MAX_SEND_SIZE constant
Date: 2024-04-23 00:23:29
Message-ID: Zib_gS-Lh-5ptfYa@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 03:40:01PM +0200, Majid Garoosi wrote:
> Any news, comments, etc. about this thread?

FWIW, I'd still be in favor of doing a GUC-ification of this part, but
at this stage I'd need more time to do a proper study of a case where
this shows benefits to prove your point, or somebody else could come
in and show it.

Andres has objected to this change, on the ground that this was not
worth it, though you are telling the contrary. I would be curious to
hear from others, first, so as we gather more opinions to reach a
consensus.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Noah Misch 2024-04-23 00:39:56 datfrozen/relfrozen update race condition
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2024-04-22 22:48:04 Re: Direct SSL connection with ALPN and HBA rules