From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Soumyadeep Chakraborty <soumyadeep2007(at)gmail(dot)com>, Zhihong Yu <zyu(at)yugabyte(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Ashwin Agrawal <ashwinstar(at)gmail(dot)com>, vanjared(at)vmware(dot)com |
Subject: | Re: ALTER TABLE SET ACCESS METHOD on partitioned tables |
Date: | 2024-04-15 01:46:00 |
Message-ID: | ZhyG2JS2z6I6Kf7a@paquier.xyz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 01:06:06AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> AFAICS, e2395cdbe posits that taking exclusive lock on pg_am in the
> middle of a bunch of concurrent regression scripts couldn't possibly
> cause any problems. Really?
There is no need for a catalog here to trigger the failure, and it
would have happened as long as a foreign table is used. The problem
introduced in 374c7a229042 fixed by e2395cdbe83a comes from a thinko
on my side, my apologies for that and the delay in replying. Thanks
for the extra fix done in 13b3b62746ec, Alvaro.
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Yusuke Egashira (Fujitsu) | 2024-04-15 01:52:33 | Resetting synchronous_standby_names can wait for CHECKPOINT to finish |
Previous Message | David G. Johnston | 2024-04-15 01:36:19 | Re: Stability of queryid in minor versions |