| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL 17 Release Management Team & Feature Freeze |
| Date: | 2024-04-07 22:50:41 |
| Message-ID: | ZhMjQXvJxr8O6Czh@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 03:10:27PM +1300, David Rowley wrote:
> Someone asked me about this, so thought it might be useful to post here.
I've received the same question.
> To express this as UTC, It's:
>
> postgres=# select '2024-04-08 00:00-12:00' at time zone 'UTC';
> timezone
> ---------------------
> 2024-04-08 12:00:00
>
> Or, time remaining, relative to now:
>
> select '2024-04-08 00:00-12:00' - now();
And, as of the moment of typing this email, I get:
=# select '2024-04-08 00:00-12:00' - now() as time_remaining;
time_remaining
-----------------
13:10:35.688134
(1 row)
So there is just a bit more than half a day remaining before the
feature freeze is in effect.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2024-04-07 22:55:42 | Re: Add bump memory context type and use it for tuplesorts |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2024-04-07 22:46:18 | Re: Cutting support for OpenSSL 1.0.1 and 1.0.2 in 17~? |