Re: Stability of queryid in minor versions

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Stability of queryid in minor versions
Date: 2024-04-16 03:16:42
Message-ID: Zh3tmmi1VONhF2i-@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 02:04:22PM +1200, David Rowley wrote:
> It makes sense to talk about the hashing variations closer to the
> object identifier part.

Mostly what I had in mind. A separate <para> for the new part you are
adding at the end of the first part feels a bit more natural split
here. Feel free to discard my comment if you think that's not worth
it.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2024-04-16 03:34:45 Re: Time to back-patch libxml deprecation fixes?
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2024-04-16 02:51:04 Re: promotion related handling in pg_sync_replication_slots()