| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Injection points: some tools to wait and wake |
| Date: | 2024-03-04 00:55:30 |
| Message-ID: | ZeUcAk3L9Wmfv5YN@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 08:24:04AM +0000, Bertrand Drouvot wrote:
> I'll try to submit the POC patch in [1] before beginning of next week now that
> we're "just waiting" if there is more comments on this current thread.
I'll look at what you have there in more details.
> [1]: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/ZdTNafYSxwnKNIhj%40ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal
The main routines have been now applied as 37b369dc67bc, with the test
in 6782709df81f. I have used the same naming policy as 6a1ea02c491d
for consistency, naming the injection point create-restart-point.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2024-03-04 01:01:36 | Re: initdb's -c option behaves wrong way? |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2024-03-03 23:46:17 | Re: Improve readability by using designated initializers when possible |