Re: Add system identifier to backup manifest

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Amul Sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Add system identifier to backup manifest
Date: 2024-03-01 05:58:37
Message-ID: ZeFujZcC7kPI9WzP@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 12:06:19PM +0530, Amul Sul wrote:
> Agreed, now they will have an error as _could not read file "<DataDir>": Is
> a directory_. But, IIUC, that what usually happens with the dev version, and
> the extension needs to be updated for compatibility with the newer version for
> the same reason.

I was reading through the remaining pieces of the patch set, and are
you sure that there is a need for 0002 at all? The only reason why
get_dir_controlfile() is introduced is to be able to get the contents
of a control file with a full path to it, and not a data folder. Now,
if I look closely, with 0002~0004 applied, the only two callers of
get_controlfile() are pg_combinebackup.c and pg_verifybackup.c. Both
of them have an access to the backup directories, which point to the
root of the data folder. pg_combinebackup can continue to use
backup_dirs[i]. pg_verifybackup has an access to the backup directory
in the context data, if I'm reading this right, so you could just use
that in verify_system_identifier().
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2024-03-01 05:59:28 Re: DOCS: Avoid using abbreviation "aka"
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2024-03-01 05:38:21 Re: DOCS: Avoid using abbreviation "aka"