Re: Spurious pgstat_drop_replslot() call

From: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Spurious pgstat_drop_replslot() call
Date: 2024-03-11 07:24:54
Message-ID: Ze6xxtNBYwdGG++e@ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 04:15:40PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> That's a slight change in behavior, unfortunately, and it cannot be
> called a bug as this improves the visibility of the stats after an
> invalidation, so this is not something that can be backpatched.

Yeah, makes sense to me.

Regards,

--
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Naylor 2024-03-11 07:32:20 Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2024-03-11 07:15:40 Re: Spurious pgstat_drop_replslot() call