Re: pg_upgrade and logical replication

From: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
To: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade and logical replication
Date: 2024-02-15 09:46:57
Message-ID: Zc3dkaa5q-PDrNJQ@pryzbyj2023
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 03:37:03AM +0000, Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) wrote:
> Attached patch modified the test accordingly. Also, it contains some optimizations.
> This can pass the test on my env:

What optimizations? I can't see them, and since the patch is described
as rearranging test cases (and therefore already difficult to read), I
guess they should be a separate patch, or the optimizations described.

--
Justin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andy Fan 2024-02-15 09:51:28 Re: A new strategy for pull-up correlated ANY_SUBLINK
Previous Message Anton Voloshin 2024-02-15 09:40:37 Re: 039_end_of_wal: error in "xl_tot_len zero" test