Re: varchar vs text columns

From: Lew <lew(at)lewscanon(dot)nospam>
To: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: varchar vs text columns
Date: 2007-07-24 13:16:49
Message-ID: ZbCdnTkmkddcZjjbnZ2dnUVZ_gudnZ2d@comcast.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 11:33:54AM -0700, Jessica Richard wrote:
>> What is the difference between varchar and text for a string column?
>> What is the benefit of using each one?
>> Is text better than varchar performance wise?
>
> From the manual:
>
> Tip: There are no performance differences between these
> three types, apart from the increased storage size when using
> the blank-padded type. While character(n) has performance
> advantages in some other database systems, it has no such
> advantages in PostgreSQL. In most situations text or
> character varying should be used instead.
>
> Note that varchar(n) will have a performance effect, because on
> insert or update you have to check to make sure the input doesn't
> exceed the specified length.

See also Peter Koczan's reply in the '"_" in a serach pattern' thread.

--
Lew

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-07-24 14:04:10 Re: problems installing postgresql on Mandriva linux
Previous Message tech 2007-07-24 11:48:55 Set up a database without backup