Re: Checking MINIMUM_VERSION_FOR_WAL_SUMMARIES

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Artur Zakirov <zaartur(at)gmail(dot)com>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp
Subject: Re: Checking MINIMUM_VERSION_FOR_WAL_SUMMARIES
Date: 2024-02-04 01:54:08
Message-ID: Zb7uQDpUN_bFesWG@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 03:11:40PM +0300, Nazir Bilal Yavuz wrote:
> Thanks for the update. The patch looks good to me.

Yes, you're right. We want the opposite to happen here. I've applied
the patch on HEAD.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message zwj 2024-02-04 06:42:52 bug report: some issues about pg_15_stable(8fa4a1ac61189efffb8b851ee77e1bc87360c445)
Previous Message jian he 2024-02-04 00:00:00 Re: Should we remove -Wdeclaration-after-statement?