Re: Add PQsendSyncMessage() to libpq

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>
Cc: Anthonin Bonnefoy <anthonin(dot)bonnefoy(at)datadoghq(dot)com>, Anton Kirilov <antonvkirilov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Add PQsendSyncMessage() to libpq
Date: 2024-01-15 07:50:07
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 03:40:36PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Hence, as a whole, wouldn't it be more consistent if the new
> PQsendPipelineSync() and the existing PQpipelineSync() call an
> internal static routine (PQPipelineSyncInternal?) that can switch
> between both modes? Let's just make the extra argument a boolean.

Yeah, I'll go with that after a second look. Attached is what I am
finishing with, and I have reproduced some numbers with the pgbench
metacommand mentioned upthread, which is reeeaaally nice.

I have also made a few edits to the tests.

Attachment Content-Type Size
v6-0001-Add-PQsendPipelineSync-to-libpq.patch text/x-diff 11.7 KB

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2024-01-15 07:50:59 Re: In-placre persistance change of a relation
Previous Message Tatsuo Ishii 2024-01-15 07:49:44 Re: pgbnech: allow to cancel queries during benchmark