Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Wolfgang Walther <walther(at)technowledgy(dot)de>, Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>, Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Subject: Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER
Date: 2025-04-08 16:48:15
Message-ID: Z_VTT6mwxZEUKWKn@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 06:42:19PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> > On 8 Apr 2025, at 18:33, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>
> > Would we have to put out minor releases for curl CVEs? I don't think we
> > have to for OpenSSL so would curl be the same?
>
> Why do you envision this being different from all other dependencies we have?
> For OpenSSL we also happily build against a version (and until recently,
> several versions) which is EOL and don't even receive security fixes.

I don't know. I know people scan our downloads and report when the
scanners detect something, but I am unclear what those scanners are
doing. Would they see some new risks with curl?

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com

Do not let urgent matters crowd out time for investment in the future.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ashutosh Bapat 2025-04-08 16:49:25 Re: Feature freeze
Previous Message Robert Haas 2025-04-08 16:45:57 Re: Feature freeze