Re: Feature freeze

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
Cc: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Feature freeze
Date: 2025-04-08 15:53:58
Message-ID: Z_VGlnfKk0DuFQN1@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 11:45:09AM -0400, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 11:20 AM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > +1 for UTC.
>
> +1, I think that AoE is needlessly obscure

We did have this discussion when AoE was chosen for PG 18 and the idea
was that as long as it is before April 18 midnight wherever you are, it
is not feature freeze yet.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com

Do not let urgent matters crowd out time for investment in the future.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2025-04-08 15:54:21 Re: Feature freeze
Previous Message Nathan Bossart 2025-04-08 15:46:41 Re: Horribly slow pg_upgrade performance with many Large Objects