| From: | Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>, Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Wolfgang Walther <walther(at)technowledgy(dot)de>, Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl> |
| Subject: | Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER |
| Date: | 2025-04-15 15:34:19 |
| Message-ID: | Z_58e4fEp8eVdWK8@msg.df7cb.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Re: Peter Eisentraut
> But worse, what you are hiding is the information what dependencies
> you are pulling in, which is the actual reason for the options. (If there
> was no external dependency, there would be no option at all.)
>
> This seems unnecessarily complicated and inconsistent. Once you have made
> the choice of taking the libcurl dependency, why not build everything that
> requires it?
I agree with this reasoning and retract my suggestion to rename the option.
Thanks for the explanation,
Christoph
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Noah Misch | 2025-04-15 15:58:50 | Re: Wrong security context for deferred triggers? |
| Previous Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2025-04-15 15:15:41 | Re: HELP: SAVEPOINT feature cases |