Re: Adding facility for injection points (or probe points?) for more advanced tests

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Adding facility for injection points (or probe points?) for more advanced tests
Date: 2024-01-07 01:20:08
Message-ID: ZZn8SKuFOBeB_BW0@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jan 05, 2024 at 10:28:47AM -0600, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> +1

Extra note for this thread: it is possible to add a SQL test case for
problems like what's been reported on this thread when facing a
partial write failure:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/18259-6e256429825dd435@postgresql.org
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message vignesh C 2024-01-07 06:55:24 Re: Support prepared statement invalidation when result types change
Previous Message Andy Fan 2024-01-07 01:10:13 Re: Shared detoast Datum proposal