Re: pg_upgrade and logical replication

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade and logical replication
Date: 2024-01-03 00:51:09
Message-ID: ZZSvfTXG8uTzQbzF@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jan 02, 2024 at 03:58:25PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 29, 2023 at 2:26 PM vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Thanks, the changes look good.
>
> Pushed.

Yeah! Thanks Amit and everybody involved here! Thanks also to Julien
for raising the thread and the problem, to start with.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2024-01-03 01:30:05 Re: Remove unneeded PGDATABASE setting from TAP tests
Previous Message Jacob Burroughs 2024-01-02 23:43:44 Re: Add new protocol message to change GUCs for usage with future protocol-only GUCs