Re: pg_upgrade and logical replication

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade and logical replication
Date: 2024-01-10 04:42:02
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 03:18:50PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> I think it would be good to finish the pending patch to improve the
> IsBinaryUpgrade check [1] which we decided to do once this patch is
> ready. Would you like to take that up or do you want me to finish it?
> [1] -
> [2] -

My apologies for the delay, again. I have sent an update here:

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2024-01-10 05:24:59 Re: Show WAL write and fsync stats in pg_stat_io
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2024-01-10 04:41:03 Re: A recent message added to pg_upgade