| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com, alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: A recent message added to pg_upgade |
| Date: | 2024-01-11 06:04:42 |
| Message-ID: | ZZ-E-vUAwN9gl9y5@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 11:25:44AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 9:08 AM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>> Hence, how about something like that:
>> "The logical replication launcher is disabled during binary upgrades,
>> as a logical replication workers running on the cluster upgrading from
>> could cause replication origins to move forward after they are copied
>> to the cluster upgrading to, creating potentially conflicts with the
>> physical files copied over."
>
> Looks better. One minor nitpick: /potentially/potential
Sure, WFM. Let's wait a bit and see if others have more comments to
offer.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2024-01-11 06:41:03 | Re: speed up a logical replica setup |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2024-01-11 05:55:44 | Re: A recent message added to pg_upgade |