Re: pgBufferUsage.blk_{read|write}_time are zero although there are pgBufferUsage.local_blks_{read|written}

From: hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz(at)depesz(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgBufferUsage.blk_{read|write}_time are zero although there are pgBufferUsage.local_blks_{read|written}
Date: 2023-10-30 14:14:16
Message-ID: ZT+6OMpG3Mmby1oa@depesz.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 10:45:05AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 04:58:20PM +0300, Nazir Bilal Yavuz wrote:
> > I think switching it to 'shared' makes sense. That shouldn't confuse
> > existing monitoring queries much as the numbers won't change, right?
> > Also, if we keep 'shared/local' there could be similar complaints to
> > this thread in the future; so, at least adding comments can be
> > helpful.
>
> The problem is that it may impact existing tools that do explain
> output deparsing. One of them is https://explain.depesz.com/ that
> Hubert Depesz Lubaczewski has implemented, and it would be sad to
> break anything related to it.
>
> I am adding Hubert in CC for comments about changing this
> "shared/local" to "shared" on a released branch. Knowing that
> "shared" and "local" will need to be handled as separate terms in 17~
> anyway, perhaps that's not a big deal, but let's be sure.

Hi,
some things will definitely break, but that's 100% OK. The change seems
needed, and I can update my parser to deal with it :)

Best regards,

depesz

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ashutosh Bapat 2023-10-30 14:36:13 Re: Not deleted mentions of the cleared path
Previous Message Tom Lane 2023-10-30 14:12:46 Re: Explicitly skip TAP tests under Meson if disabled