Re: Partial aggregates pushdown

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: "Fujii(dot)Yuki(at)df(dot)MitsubishiElectric(dot)co(dot)jp" <Fujii(dot)Yuki(at)df(dot)mitsubishielectric(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Alexander Pyhalov <a(dot)pyhalov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, "Finnerty, Jim" <jfinnert(at)amazon(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Ilya Gladyshev <i(dot)gladyshev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Subject: Re: Partial aggregates pushdown
Date: 2023-09-26 14:16:30
Message-ID: ZRLnvjkgiPGhXNyF@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 06:26:25AM +0000, Fujii(dot)Yuki(at)df(dot)MitsubishiElectric(dot)co(dot)jp wrote:
> Hi Mr.Bruce.
> > I think this needs to be explained in the docs. I am ready to adjust the patch to improve the wording whenever you are
> > ready. Should I do it now and post an updated version for you to use?
> The following explanation was omitted from the documentation, so I added it.
> > * false - no check
> > * true, remove version < sender - check
> I have responded to your comment, but if there is a problem with the wording, could you please suggest a correction?

I like your new wording, thanks.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com

Only you can decide what is important to you.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Benoit Lobréau 2023-09-26 14:27:03 Re: Questions about the new subscription parameter: password_required
Previous Message jacktby jacktby 2023-09-26 14:16:15 What's the ItemPointer's meaning here?