hot standby <-> Hot Standby

From: "Daniel Westermann (DWE)" <daniel(dot)westermann(at)dbi-services(dot)com>
To: "pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: hot standby <-> Hot Standby
Date: 2022-02-26 16:54:24
Message-ID: ZR0P278MB09205CFAADF792E09ECF5B91D23F9@ZR0P278MB0920.CHEP278.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

Hi,

which rules do we follow for writing hot standby? Looking here:
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/hot-standby.html

... it does not seem to be consistent. We have "Hot Standby" and "hot standby" mixed throughout the page, e.g.

"If a hot standby processes"
"If the standby is not a hot standby"
"There are several limitations of Hot Standby"
"it might not be possible to re-enter Hot Standby"

Regards,
Daniel

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2022-02-26 17:29:57 Re: hot standby <-> Hot Standby
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2022-02-18 16:05:04 Re: maximum number of backtrace frames logged by backtrace_functions