Re: pg_upgrade --check fails to warn about abstime

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade --check fails to warn about abstime
Date: 2023-09-22 01:46:04
Message-ID: ZQzx3Dt8TKhLwxCF@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 06:54:24PM +0200, Álvaro Herrera wrote:
> I got a complaint that pg_upgrade --check fails to raise red flags when
> the source database contains type abstime when upgrading from pg11. The
> type (along with reltime and tinterval) was removed by pg12.

Wow, I never added code to pg_upgrade to check for that, and no one
complained either.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com

Only you can decide what is important to you.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) 2023-09-22 02:44:41 RE: CI: Unfamiliar error while testing macOS
Previous Message Chapman Flack 2023-09-22 01:16:07 Re: Questioning an errcode and message in jsonb.c