| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Have better wording for snapshot file reading failure |
| Date: | 2023-09-15 05:20:59 |
| Message-ID: | ZQPpu3Hq9IoOFHR9@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 05:33:35PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> I'd probably just go for something like "snapshot \"%s\" does not exist",
> similar to what we report for unknown tables etc. Arguably changing the
> errcode to ERRCODE_UNDEFINED_OBJECT would make this more precise?
Good points. Updated as suggested in v2 attached.
--
Michael
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| snapmgr-import-error-v2.patch | text/x-diff | 2.5 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2023-09-15 05:26:16 | Re: Bug fix for psql's meta-command \ev |
| Previous Message | Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) | 2023-09-15 03:15:12 | RE: [PoC] pg_upgrade: allow to upgrade publisher node |