On Tue, Aug 08, 2023 at 11:53:32AM +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> As I mentioned in another thread, I'm uncertain about our stance on
> the class id of the wait event. If a class acts as a namespace, we
> should include it in the view. Otherwise, if the class id is just an
> attribute of the wait event, we should make the event name unique.
Including the class name in the view makes the most sense to me, FWIW,
as it could be also possible that one reuses an event name in the
existing in-core list, but for extensions. That's of course not
something I would recommend.
--
Michael