Re: WAL Insertion Lock Improvements

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WAL Insertion Lock Improvements
Date: 2023-07-25 22:40:31
Message-ID: ZMBPX7MAFxIUU8L+@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 09:49:01AM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> FWIW, I'm working on a patch that replaces WAL insert locks as a whole,
> because they don't scale all that well.

What were you looking at here? Just wondering.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2023-07-25 22:46:47 Re: WAL Insertion Lock Improvements
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2023-07-25 22:39:37 Re: WAL Insertion Lock Improvements