Re: Make pgbench exit on SIGINT more reliably

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Tristan Partin <tristan(at)neon(dot)tech>
Cc: Yugo NAGATA <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Make pgbench exit on SIGINT more reliably
Date: 2023-07-11 03:29:37
Message-ID: ZKzMoeNnQ3jXf25U@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 09:42:05AM -0500, Tristan Partin wrote:
> I would say there probably isn't much benefit if you think the polling
> for CancelRequested is fine. Looking at the other patch, I think it
> might be simple to add an exit code for SIGINT. But I think it might be
> best to do it after that patch is merged. I added the other patch to the
> commitfest for July. Holding off on this one.

Okay, I am going to jump on the patch to switch to COPY, then.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message jian he 2023-07-11 03:34:37 Re: Cleaning up array_in()
Previous Message Peter Smith 2023-07-11 02:59:24 Re: [PATCH] Reuse Workers and Replication Slots during Logical Replication