From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
---|---|
To: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Imseih (AWS), Sami" <simseih(at)amazon(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Add index scan progress to pg_stat_progress_vacuum |
Date: | 2023-07-06 02:14:51 |
Message-ID: | ZKYjm4ofOYuRHpXh@paquier.xyz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jul 06, 2023 at 11:07:14AM +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> Thank you for updating the patch. It looks good to me too. I've
> updated the commit message.
Thanks. I was planning to review this patch today and/or tomorrow now
that my stack of things to do is getting slightly lower (registered my
name as committer as well a few weeks ago to not format).
One thing I was planning to do is to move the new message processing
API for the incrementational updates in its own commit for clarity, as
that's a separate concept than the actual feature, useful on its own.
Anyway, would you prefer taking care of it?
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2023-07-06 02:41:02 | Re: test_extensions: fix inconsistency between meson.build and Makefile |
Previous Message | jian he | 2023-07-06 02:14:46 | contrib/pg_freespacemap first check input argument, then relation_open. |