Re: PG 16 draft release notes ready

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PG 16 draft release notes ready
Date: 2023-07-04 21:32:07
Message-ID: ZKSP1zSl2VOf+F5m@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jul 4, 2023 at 03:31:05PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 04:49:47PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I have completed the first draft of the PG 16 release notes. You can
> > see the output here:
> >
> > https://momjian.us/pgsql_docs/release-16.html
> >
> > I will adjust it to the feedback I receive; that URL will quickly show
> > all updates.
>
> Sawada-san has mentioned on twitter that fdd8937 is not mentioned in
> the release notes, and it seems to me that he is right. This is
> described as a bug in the commit log, but it did not get backpatched
> because of the lack of complaints. Also, because we've removed
> support for anything older than Windows 10 in PG16, this change very
> easy to do.

I did review this and wasn't sure exactly what I would describe. It is
saying huge pages will now work on some versions of Windows 10 but
didn't before?

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com

Only you can decide what is important to you.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Matthias van de Meent 2023-07-04 21:53:41 Re: Parallel CREATE INDEX for BRIN indexes
Previous Message Daniel Gustafsson 2023-07-04 20:54:54 Re: pg_basebackup check vs Windows file path limits