On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 09:04:26AM -0400, Evan Jones wrote:
> My one last suggestion: We *could* revert the backpatching if we are
> concerned about this change, but I'm not personally sure that is necessary.
> As we discussed, this is an unusual corner case in an "extension" type that
> many won't even have enabled.
As a whole, I'd like to think that this is an improvement even for
stable branches with these weird isspace() handlings, so I'm OK with
the current status in all the branches. There's an argument about \v,
IMO, but I won't fight hard for it either even if it would be more
consistent with the way array values are handled.
--
Michael