Re: SOC II Type 2 report.

From: raf <raf(at)raf(dot)org>
To: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SOC II Type 2 report.
Date: 2023-06-14 07:48:27
Message-ID: ZIlwy4ftHXdi1j0a@raf.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 07:54:21AM -0700, Christophe Pettus <xof(at)thebuild(dot)com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> > On Jun 12, 2023, at 11:57, Raj Kiran <raj(dot)kiran(at)prokopto(dot)io> wrote:
> > Prokopto is completing our annual vendor review process. Please share your most recent SOC II Type 2 report.
>
> The PostgreSQL project isn't SOC2 certified, and will almost certainly
> never be. If you require SOC2 compliance, you'll need to work with a
> commercial (that is to say, not free) vendor who is SOC2 certified in
> order to bring PostgreSQL under their certification.

And I doubt that Postgres could be described as a
vendor. By definition, a vendor is a person or
organisation that sells something.

OED: vendor(n): One who disposes of a thing by sale; a seller

cheers,
raf

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ruslan Zakirov 2023-06-14 10:03:06 Re: Reproducing incorrect order with order by in a subquery
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2023-06-13 21:56:42 Re: Support logical replication of DDLs