Re: Docs: Encourage strong server verification with SCRAM

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: Jacob Champion <jchampion(at)timescale(dot)com>, "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Docs: Encourage strong server verification with SCRAM
Date: 2023-06-01 12:28:32
Message-ID: ZHiO8KJCGbD-oOu6@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 10:22:28AM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> It's true that an attacker kan use offline analysis but it makes it sound
> easier than it might be in practice. I would have written "to potentially
> determine".

Hmm. Okay by me.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker 2023-06-01 12:41:40 [PATCH] Missing dep on Catalog.pm in meson rules
Previous Message Peter Smith 2023-06-01 12:22:21 Re: [PATCH] Reuse Workers and Replication Slots during Logical Replication